dc.contributor.advisor |
Dixon, Alison |
|
dc.contributor.advisor |
Dixon, Graeme |
|
dc.contributor.advisor |
Duke, Jan |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Pearson, Janet Ruth |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-11-19T02:43:43Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2007-11-19T02:43:43Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2002 |
|
dc.date.issued |
2002 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/189 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This research investigated the way in which one low decile New Zealand primary
school in the greater Wellington region practised health promotion, as defined by
the World Health Organisation when specifying a health-promoting School. The
focus was to discern how one purposefully selected school with many potential
social, economic and cultural risk factors undertook the challenge of improving
student health. The lens used was that of an experienced community nurse /
nurse educator who had previous school nursing experience.
Objectives were: to explore the concept of the ‘health-promoting school’ in a
specific New Zealand context; to develop and use appropriate research methods
to assess a single low decile school in relation to World Health Organization
health-promoting school components and checkpoints; to work with the school
community to identify health issues; and, to record external and internal changes
that could impact on school health over a finite time period.
Case study, guided by Hartrick, Lindsey and Hills Health Promotion Nursing
framework was selected as the most appropriate method to collect both
quantitative and qualitative evidence with the aim of providing a clear
understanding of the particular case. Previous research validated an intrinsic
case study approach for an inquiry that involved both the process of learning
about a specific case and the product of that learning. Triangulated evidence
from multiple sources accumulated from multiple data collection methods was
used to answer the checkpoints of components within the health-promoting
school framework developed by the Western Pacific Region of the World Health
Organization in 1996.
Results confirmed that the school was working appropriately within the scope of
their educational practice to provide a health-promoting school environment for
the school community. Gaps and issues identified included an element of talking
past each other between the cultures of the education organisation and the
nominated health service provider respectively that contributed to a lack of
appropriate and accessible health service delivery for the school population.
Teaching staff considered that they had insufficient access to health knowledge,
and input from health service staff did not meet health education requirements for
the school. Staff preference for increased school nurse involvement was not
realised. The consequence was that two outside agencies (KiwiCan and Life
Education Trust) delivered the bulk of the Health and Physical Education
curriculum which resulted in a degree of fragmentation of health education for
students.
The issues that were identified demonstrated that health services in the area
were not satisfactorily meeting the needs of the community and were not
addressing the health inequities for the predominantly Pacific Island and Maori
students and of their families that formed the school community.
The conclusion reached was that a full-service school approach should be
considered by the school and the local District Health Board as one way to
overcome the current lack of access to health services for the school community.Assertions included the potential integration of locally available services by a
school-based nurse coordinator supported by health professionals (Nurse
Practitioner and Pacific Island Community Health Worker) and social workers.
The vision included professionals working within their professional scopes of
practice as part of a Primary Health Organisation with the aim of appropriately
addressing the health inequities experienced by the school population. |
en_NZ |
dc.language.iso |
en_NZ |
|
dc.publisher |
Victoria University of Wellington |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Community health nursing |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
School nursing |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Cultural safety |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Practice development |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Pacific Island students |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Maori students |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Nurse educator |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Case study |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Mixed method |
en_NZ |
dc.title |
Health Promotion in One New Zealand Primary School: a Case Study |
en_NZ |
dc.type |
Text |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.contributor.unit |
Graduate School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.marsden |
321216 Health Promotion |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.marsden |
321210 Community Child Health |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.marsden |
321200 Public Health and Health Services |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.type.vuw |
Awarded Doctoral Thesis |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.discipline |
Nursing |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.grantor |
Victoria University of Wellington |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.level |
Doctoral |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.name |
Doctor of Philosophy |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.cinahl |
Health Promotion |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.cinahl |
Interprofessional Relations |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor |
119999 Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified |
en_NZ |