Victoria University

Investment-Timing and the Threat of Disruption

ResearchArchive/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Guthrie, Graeme
dc.contributor.author Campbell, Ryan John
dc.date.accessioned 2020-01-26T22:15:06Z
dc.date.available 2020-01-26T22:15:06Z
dc.date.copyright 2019
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.uri http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/8536
dc.description.abstract An incumbent firm needs to determine how to best manage the risk of the arrival of a disruptive technology. The numerous actions available to the incumbent firm indicates a complex real-options model of investment is required. This thesis investigates the behaviour of an incumbent firm, with assets-in-place, when they have access to an investment opportunity. The incumbent must not only choose when to invest in the opportunity, but also the optimal structure with which to compete against a new entrant who also has this investment opportunity. In order to delay competition in the market the incumbent can elect to permanently abandon the innovative option rather than seek to compete with the new entrant. The assets-in-place contributes significant value to the incumbent and by delaying the competition effect, the incumbent can reduce the cannibalization of assets-in-place. This is despite the fact that the incumbent can attempt to profitably invest in the innovation before the entrant. Clearly the assets-in-place provide a benefit to firm value for the incumbent, but act as a burden for the growth option’s development. Should consumer preferences begin to favour the innovation, then the decision to abandon the growth option loses its value. The incumbent in this instance does not care that they may accelerate the entrant’s investment as they can still profitably preempt the entrant. In a competitive market, when the incumbent efficiently produces the innovation at no extra cost compared to an independent firm, the incumbent will elect to internalise, rather than spin off, the growth option. When the incumbent produces the innovation at a higher cost, than other market participants, they will spin off the growth option instead of internalising. When consumers favour the innovation, the incumbent becomes indifferent between spinning off and internalising the growth option as the objective functions in both cases converge to maximising the value of the growth option. en_NZ
dc.language.iso en_NZ
dc.publisher Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
dc.subject Real options en_NZ
dc.subject Disruption en_NZ
dc.subject Investment en_NZ
dc.title Investment-Timing and the Threat of Disruption en_NZ
dc.type Text en_NZ
vuwschema.contributor.unit School of Economics and Finance en_NZ
vuwschema.type.vuw Awarded Research Masters Thesis en_NZ
thesis.degree.discipline Finance en_NZ
thesis.degree.grantor Victoria University of Wellington en_NZ
thesis.degree.level Master's en_NZ
thesis.degree.name Master of Commerce en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor 140104 Microeconomic Theory en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor 140207 Financial Economics en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor 150201 Finance en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor 150205 Investment and Risk Management en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor 150307 Innovation and Technology Management en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcseo 970114 Expanding Knowledge in Economics en_NZ
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcseo 970115 Expanding Knowledge in Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services en_NZ


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ResearchArchive


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics