dc.contributor.advisor |
Brock, Stuart |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Ngai, Justin |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-02-25T20:26:00Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-02-25T20:26:00Z |
|
dc.date.copyright |
2013 |
|
dc.date.issued |
2013 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/handle/10063/2640 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Abstract entities have long been viewed as entities that lack causal powers; that is, they cannot be constitutive of causes or effects. This thesis aims to reject this claim and argue that abstract objects are indeed part of the causal order. I will call this thesis ‘AOCO’ for short. In the first chapter I argue that other philosophers have committed themselves to the claim that some abstract objects have been caused to come into existence. In the second chapter, I argue that the best solution to Benacerraf’s problem is to concede that abstract objects have a causal influence on what we believe. In the third chapter I examine and evaluate objections to AOCO. |
en_NZ |
dc.language.iso |
en_NZ |
|
dc.publisher |
Victoria University of Wellington |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Abstract |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Causation |
en_NZ |
dc.subject |
Ontology |
en_NZ |
dc.title |
Abstract Objects in the Causal Order |
en_NZ |
dc.type |
Text |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.contributor.unit |
School of History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.marsden |
440107 Metaphysics |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.type.vuw |
Awarded Research Masters Thesis |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.discipline |
Philosophy |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.grantor |
Victoria University of Wellington |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.level |
Master's |
en_NZ |
thesis.degree.name |
Master of Arts |
en_NZ |
vuwschema.subject.anzsrcfor |
220309 Metaphysics |
en_NZ |